Before declaring a mistrial Monday, Justice Peter Hambly had harsh words for the plea deal proposed for Jeremy Glenfield, the lawyers who put the deal together, and anyone else who might find the agreement acceptable.

“The proposal in this case would bring the administration of justice into disrepute and is contrary to the public interest,” he said.

“It does not address the seriousness of what happened … and it does not protect the public by sufficiently deterring others and condemning impaired driving.”

Glenfield. 36. is accused of impaired driving causing death, dangerous driving causing death and refusal to provide a breath sample.

In December 2011, Glenfield was driving along Gerber Road near Wellesley.

Approaching Nafziger Road, he went past a stop sign and into the path of a minivan being driven by Kevin Huber.

Huber’s son, 11-year-old Jeremy Huber, was killed as a result of the crash.

Last week, Hambly was presented with a plea deal that would see the charge of impaired driving causing death dropped in exchange for Glenfield pleading guilty to the other offences.

His case would then be put off until September, when he would be sentenced to 27 months in prison.

The deal had the support of both lawyers – a circumstance under which judges rarely suggest or demand alternatives.

That wasn’t the case this time, with Hambly blasting the ruling as “wholly inadequate.”

Monday, he reiterated those opinions.

“There is no justification for withdrawing the impaired driving causing death charge,” he said.

“There is abundant evidence that Mr. Glenfield was impaired.”

Jeremy Huber’s family also supported the plea deal, citing forgiveness for Glenfield and a desire to find closure.

Hambly called that support “irrelevant” to his decision, saying victims “must be shown respect” but their opinions ultimately should have no bearing on a sentence.

Saying he could no longer presume Glenfield’s innocence due to his lawyer admitting guilt on two charges on his behalf, Hambly declared a mistrial.

The case will return to court Friday, with another judge being assigned to the case.

A senior judge is expected to rule on whether the new judge will be presented with the original charges laid against Glenfield or the proposed plea deal.

A second judge has indicated a willingness to accept the plea deal.